Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

Eurozone – High stakes amid political fracture risks

KEY POINTS
The direct impact of higher US tariffs on the Eurozone would likely be limited
Of more concern would be an escalation of the trade war with China hampering domestic investment in the bloc
Increased geopolitical tensions risk EU political fractures amid high public indebtedness vulnerability

Trade tariffs: Marginal direct impact

The US election’s potential impact on the Eurozone is rather binary – a Kamala Harris victory is unlikely to have a material effect but a Donald Trump win would. Trump wants to narrow the US trade deficit and the Eurozone is a key contributor to this. The bloc exported €450bn of goods in 2023 (or 3.1% of GDP) (Exhibit 4), yielding a surplus to the US of €133bn.

Exhibit 4: Products exported by the Eurozone to the US

If he were to secure a second term, Trump has proposed a blanket 10% tariff on the rest of the world, including the Eurozone. The weighted average of US tariffs on EU exports is around 3%, according to World Trade Organization data, implying a further 6.8% rise in export prices. Assuming an historical elasticity of around -1, we estimate it would reduce total Eurozone goods exports by €30bn (0.2% of GDP) – a rather limited direct impact. We note, that the bulk of eurozone exports gross value added to the US mainly consists of intermediate goods which may suggest some downside to historical elasticity. Such an impact should be further moderated by a depreciation of the euro against the dollar in response to domestic tariffs and other policy adjustments limiting the Federal Reserve’s space for cuts. This would likely lower the price of Eurozone exports, also potentially benefitting the bloc from increased competitiveness in non-US countries if they retaliate with increased tariffs on the US, but not on the Eurozone. Since the start of 2023, net trade has already added 0.2 percentage points (ppt) per quarter to Eurozone growth (0.0ppt in 2014-2019), with share of US exports up 8% – tariffs present a direct risk.

We see a bigger indirect risk if a second-term Trump trade policy starts a trade war between the three main economic blocks. Trump has been even more aggressive towards China, threatening 60% tariffs. At the risk of oversimplifying, Chinese exporters would likely try to find a substitute market with similar consumers to the US; Europe would be the natural target. A number of European industries, already in a tumultuous state, would face greater competition from Chinese producers, raising expectations of EU intervention with its own tariffs. Yet the current negotiation on Chinese electric vehicle tariffs has revealed challenges on this path. Reaching an EU majority is complex, as each country’s interests differ. Furthermore, political stability in the Eurozone has significantly eroded since Trump’s first term and key elections loom in Germany (2025), Italy (2026) and France (2027 at the latest).

For the Eurozone, global protectionist policies, together with associated economic uncertainty would likely affect domestic and foreign investment. The impact is difficult to estimate but would be crucial for both short and medium-term growth.


European security tensions

US support for Ukraine and implications for NATO are also a concern. Trump has claimed he would secure a swift peace deal in Ukraine. The fear is that this is an implicit threat of withdrawing support to Ukraine. The EU would not be able to replace the scale of US support – especially in the materials. This would raise concerns about US commitment to NATO and European security more broadly. In recent years, European countries have increased their defence spending, though still not all match their NATO pledges. A Trump presidency would likely push for this at least, but a perception of broader US security withdrawal may lead countries to raise defence spending more materially, something that would additionally strain vulnerable EU public finances and relations.

Fluctuations in energy prices may also impact the Eurozone. Increased US production and a deal with Ukraine may lower gas prices, but elevated Middle East tensions could boost oil costs.

Download the PDF to read the full article
Read the full article (534.5 KB)

    Disclaimer

    This website is published by AXA Investment Managers Asia (Singapore) Ltd. (Registration No. 199001714W) for general circulation and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments, nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities. It has been prepared without taking into account the specific personal circumstances, investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person and may be subject to change without notice. Please consult your financial or other professional advisers before making any investment decision.

    Due to its simplification, this publication is partial and opinions, estimates and forecasts herein are subjective and subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee forecasts made will come to pass. Data, figures, declarations, analysis, predictions and other information in this publication is provided based on our state of knowledge at the time of creation of this publication. Whilst every care is taken, no representation or warranty (including liability towards third parties), express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information contained herein. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the recipient. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision.

    All investment involves risk, including the loss of capital. The value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

    Some of the Services and/or products may not be available for offer to retail investors.

    This publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.